Review



ige  (Chondrex Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Chondrex Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Chondrex Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Chondrex Inc ige
    Ige, supplied by Chondrex Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 39 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ova+ige/Mouse+Anti-OVA+IgE+Antibody+Assay+Kit/pm42102609-86-8-10
    Average 94 stars, based on 39 article reviews
    ige - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Chondrex Inc ige
    Ige, supplied by Chondrex Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ova+ige/Mouse+Anti-OVA+IgE+Antibody+Assay+Kit/pm42102609-86-8-10
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ige - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Chondrex Inc mouse antiova ige monoclonal antibody
    Mouse Antiova Ige Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Chondrex Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ova+ige/Mouse+Anti+OVA+Monoclonal+IgE+Antibody+E-G5%2C+lyophilized/pm41912069-65-34-41
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse antiova ige monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Cusabio mouse ova specific ige sige
    Mouse Ova Specific Ige Sige, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ova+ige/Mouse+ovalbumin+specific+IgE%2COVA+sIgE+ELISA+Kit/pm41776607-163-17-30
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse ova specific ige sige - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Chondrex Inc ova specific ige
    ( A ) Airway resistance measured after increasing concentrations of nebulized methacholine to anesthetized mice. ( B ) Representative BAL differential counts and PAS staining images and ( C ) quantification of BAL eosinophilia and ( D ) volume of mucus within airway epithelium. ( E ) Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis from whole-lung homogenates detecting the expression of Il13 gene. ( F ) Serum titers <t>of</t> <t>anti-OVA–specific</t> IgE. ( G ) Annotated immune cells were subsetted from whole-lung scRNA-seq and 2D plotted using uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction (UMAP). ( H ) OVA and OVA + FD immune cell UMAP representation overlaid. ( I ) DEG number comparing OVA versus OVA + FD groups. ( J ) Representative flow cytometry plots highlighting MDM and DC identification and ( K and L ) quantification of frequency of these cell types within parent gates. Results are plotted as means ± SEM, and difference between means were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test ( n = 6 to 9).
    Ova Specific Ige, supplied by Chondrex Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ova+ige/Mouse+Anti-OVA+IgE+Antibody+Assay+Kit/pmc12947861-246-10-12
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ova specific ige - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Chondrex Inc immunoglobulin e ige
    ( A ) Airway resistance measured after increasing concentrations of nebulized methacholine to anesthetized mice. ( B ) Representative BAL differential counts and PAS staining images and ( C ) quantification of BAL eosinophilia and ( D ) volume of mucus within airway epithelium. ( E ) Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis from whole-lung homogenates detecting the expression of Il13 gene. ( F ) Serum titers <t>of</t> <t>anti-OVA–specific</t> IgE. ( G ) Annotated immune cells were subsetted from whole-lung scRNA-seq and 2D plotted using uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction (UMAP). ( H ) OVA and OVA + FD immune cell UMAP representation overlaid. ( I ) DEG number comparing OVA versus OVA + FD groups. ( J ) Representative flow cytometry plots highlighting MDM and DC identification and ( K and L ) quantification of frequency of these cell types within parent gates. Results are plotted as means ± SEM, and difference between means were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test ( n = 6 to 9).
    Immunoglobulin E Ige, supplied by Chondrex Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ova+ige/Mouse+Anti-OVA+IgE+Antibody+Assay+Kit/pm41389453-103-7-11
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    immunoglobulin e ige - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Chondrex Inc mouse anti ova ige
    ( A ) Airway resistance measured after increasing concentrations of nebulized methacholine to anesthetized mice. ( B ) Representative BAL differential counts and PAS staining images and ( C ) quantification of BAL eosinophilia and ( D ) volume of mucus within airway epithelium. ( E ) Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis from whole-lung homogenates detecting the expression of Il13 gene. ( F ) Serum titers <t>of</t> <t>anti-OVA–specific</t> IgE. ( G ) Annotated immune cells were subsetted from whole-lung scRNA-seq and 2D plotted using uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction (UMAP). ( H ) OVA and OVA + FD immune cell UMAP representation overlaid. ( I ) DEG number comparing OVA versus OVA + FD groups. ( J ) Representative flow cytometry plots highlighting MDM and DC identification and ( K and L ) quantification of frequency of these cell types within parent gates. Results are plotted as means ± SEM, and difference between means were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test ( n = 6 to 9).
    Mouse Anti Ova Ige, supplied by Chondrex Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ova+ige/Anti-HMGB1+Peptide+(2-11)+Antibodies/bio_rxiv__2025__10__27__684919-46-3-7
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti ova ige - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bio-Rad monoclonal mouse anti ova ige
    ( A ) Airway resistance measured after increasing concentrations of nebulized methacholine to anesthetized mice. ( B ) Representative BAL differential counts and PAS staining images and ( C ) quantification of BAL eosinophilia and ( D ) volume of mucus within airway epithelium. ( E ) Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis from whole-lung homogenates detecting the expression of Il13 gene. ( F ) Serum titers <t>of</t> <t>anti-OVA–specific</t> IgE. ( G ) Annotated immune cells were subsetted from whole-lung scRNA-seq and 2D plotted using uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction (UMAP). ( H ) OVA and OVA + FD immune cell UMAP representation overlaid. ( I ) DEG number comparing OVA versus OVA + FD groups. ( J ) Representative flow cytometry plots highlighting MDM and DC identification and ( K and L ) quantification of frequency of these cell types within parent gates. Results are plotted as means ± SEM, and difference between means were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test ( n = 6 to 9).
    Monoclonal Mouse Anti Ova Ige, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ova+ige/Mouse+anti+Ovalbumin/pmc12426108-101-18-22
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    monoclonal mouse anti ova ige - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bio-Rad monoclonal ova ige antibody
    ( A ) Airway resistance measured after increasing concentrations of nebulized methacholine to anesthetized mice. ( B ) Representative BAL differential counts and PAS staining images and ( C ) quantification of BAL eosinophilia and ( D ) volume of mucus within airway epithelium. ( E ) Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis from whole-lung homogenates detecting the expression of Il13 gene. ( F ) Serum titers <t>of</t> <t>anti-OVA–specific</t> IgE. ( G ) Annotated immune cells were subsetted from whole-lung scRNA-seq and 2D plotted using uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction (UMAP). ( H ) OVA and OVA + FD immune cell UMAP representation overlaid. ( I ) DEG number comparing OVA versus OVA + FD groups. ( J ) Representative flow cytometry plots highlighting MDM and DC identification and ( K and L ) quantification of frequency of these cell types within parent gates. Results are plotted as means ± SEM, and difference between means were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test ( n = 6 to 9).
    Monoclonal Ova Ige Antibody, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+ova+ige/Mouse+anti+Ovalbumin/pm40850091-129-12-17
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    monoclonal ova ige antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A ) Airway resistance measured after increasing concentrations of nebulized methacholine to anesthetized mice. ( B ) Representative BAL differential counts and PAS staining images and ( C ) quantification of BAL eosinophilia and ( D ) volume of mucus within airway epithelium. ( E ) Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis from whole-lung homogenates detecting the expression of Il13 gene. ( F ) Serum titers of anti-OVA–specific IgE. ( G ) Annotated immune cells were subsetted from whole-lung scRNA-seq and 2D plotted using uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction (UMAP). ( H ) OVA and OVA + FD immune cell UMAP representation overlaid. ( I ) DEG number comparing OVA versus OVA + FD groups. ( J ) Representative flow cytometry plots highlighting MDM and DC identification and ( K and L ) quantification of frequency of these cell types within parent gates. Results are plotted as means ± SEM, and difference between means were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test ( n = 6 to 9).

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: A beneficial environment promotes immune resilience through epigenetic regulation

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ady7317

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Airway resistance measured after increasing concentrations of nebulized methacholine to anesthetized mice. ( B ) Representative BAL differential counts and PAS staining images and ( C ) quantification of BAL eosinophilia and ( D ) volume of mucus within airway epithelium. ( E ) Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis from whole-lung homogenates detecting the expression of Il13 gene. ( F ) Serum titers of anti-OVA–specific IgE. ( G ) Annotated immune cells were subsetted from whole-lung scRNA-seq and 2D plotted using uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction (UMAP). ( H ) OVA and OVA + FD immune cell UMAP representation overlaid. ( I ) DEG number comparing OVA versus OVA + FD groups. ( J ) Representative flow cytometry plots highlighting MDM and DC identification and ( K and L ) quantification of frequency of these cell types within parent gates. Results are plotted as means ± SEM, and difference between means were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test ( n = 6 to 9).

    Article Snippet: Mouse CCL8 (BioLegend, no. 446904), human CCL8 (BioLegend, no. 442204), OVA-specific IgE (Chondrex, no. 3004), and OVA-specific IgG1 (Chondrex, no. 3013) were used according to the supplier’s protocols.

    Techniques: Staining, Reverse Transcription, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Flow Cytometry

    ( A ) Volcano plot showing DEGs in OVA versus OVA + FD MDMs, analyzed by model-based analysis of single-cell transcriptomics (MAST). ( B ) Ccl8 gene expression in OVA versus OVA + FD. ( C ) Mouse serum CCL8 measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. ( D ) Serum CCL8 levels in human patients with asthma versus healthy controls. ( E ) WT mice were sensitized to OVA and treated daily with anti-CCL8 antibody or isotype 6 hours before OVA challenge. Representative BAL Giemsa cytospins and PAS-stained lung sections are shown. ( F ) Quantification of BAL eosinophils and ( G ) volume of mucus. ( H ) Lung inflammatory eosinophils (CD45 + , Ly6g neg , CD125 int , SiglecF +, CD11c + , and CD101 + ) quantified by flow cytometry. ( I and J ) CCL8 gene expression in murine BMDMs and human monocytes after 48 hours of FD exposure followed by 6 hours of LPS stimulation. ( K ) Average gene expression from MHCII-related genes ( H2-Eb1 , H2-Ab1 , H2-Aa , and Ciita ) were down-regulated in OVA + FD MDMs. ( L ) MHCII mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) on lung MDMs (CD45 + , F4/80 + , Ly6G neg , CD11b + , and CCR2 + ). ( M ) HLA-DR MFI in human monocyte–derived APCs exposed to FD for 48 hours and LPS for 6 hours. ( N ) BMDMs pulsed with OVA 323–339 peptide after FD and LPS stimulation and then cocultured with naive CD4 + T cells. T cell proliferation assessed by CellTrace™ Violet (CTV) MFI-based division index. ( O ) Proliferation-associated gene ( Cenpe , Top2a , and Mki67 ) average expression within CD4 + T cell subset in OVA versus OVA + FD. Modules were clustered by KEGG/Reactome terms; antigen presentation node shows altered interaction strength. Results are plotted as means ± SEM, and difference between means were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test ( n = 4 to 19).

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: A beneficial environment promotes immune resilience through epigenetic regulation

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ady7317

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Volcano plot showing DEGs in OVA versus OVA + FD MDMs, analyzed by model-based analysis of single-cell transcriptomics (MAST). ( B ) Ccl8 gene expression in OVA versus OVA + FD. ( C ) Mouse serum CCL8 measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. ( D ) Serum CCL8 levels in human patients with asthma versus healthy controls. ( E ) WT mice were sensitized to OVA and treated daily with anti-CCL8 antibody or isotype 6 hours before OVA challenge. Representative BAL Giemsa cytospins and PAS-stained lung sections are shown. ( F ) Quantification of BAL eosinophils and ( G ) volume of mucus. ( H ) Lung inflammatory eosinophils (CD45 + , Ly6g neg , CD125 int , SiglecF +, CD11c + , and CD101 + ) quantified by flow cytometry. ( I and J ) CCL8 gene expression in murine BMDMs and human monocytes after 48 hours of FD exposure followed by 6 hours of LPS stimulation. ( K ) Average gene expression from MHCII-related genes ( H2-Eb1 , H2-Ab1 , H2-Aa , and Ciita ) were down-regulated in OVA + FD MDMs. ( L ) MHCII mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) on lung MDMs (CD45 + , F4/80 + , Ly6G neg , CD11b + , and CCR2 + ). ( M ) HLA-DR MFI in human monocyte–derived APCs exposed to FD for 48 hours and LPS for 6 hours. ( N ) BMDMs pulsed with OVA 323–339 peptide after FD and LPS stimulation and then cocultured with naive CD4 + T cells. T cell proliferation assessed by CellTrace™ Violet (CTV) MFI-based division index. ( O ) Proliferation-associated gene ( Cenpe , Top2a , and Mki67 ) average expression within CD4 + T cell subset in OVA versus OVA + FD. Modules were clustered by KEGG/Reactome terms; antigen presentation node shows altered interaction strength. Results are plotted as means ± SEM, and difference between means were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test ( n = 4 to 19).

    Article Snippet: Mouse CCL8 (BioLegend, no. 446904), human CCL8 (BioLegend, no. 442204), OVA-specific IgE (Chondrex, no. 3004), and OVA-specific IgG1 (Chondrex, no. 3013) were used according to the supplier’s protocols.

    Techniques: Single-cell Transcriptomics, Gene Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Immunopeptidomics